IRS installment agreements, explained by a tax attorney

(813) 229-7100
IRS Solution LawyerPayment plans and installment agreements
Menu

Win an IRS Appeal

Appeals settle on litigation risk, and the protest is the whole game. The architecture of a winning file and the conference where it pays.

By Darrin T. Mish, tax attorneyPublished June 11, 20264 min read

IRS appeals are won before the conference - in the protest, the document that frames every issue the settlement officer will price. Build it like the litigation-risk memo it is, and the conference becomes collection of what the file already earned.

Build the Protest as a Hazards Memo

The Appeals standard is the hazards of litigation: what would happen if this case went before a judge, and what settlement reflects that risk. So the winning protest argues like a court filing: each disputed issue stated cleanly, the facts established with exhibits attached and indexed, the law cited with authorities, and the conclusion framed as risk - here is why the government likely loses this issue, and here is the documentation a judge would see. Angry letters get sympathy and the examiner's number back; hazards memos get percentages.

Prepare the Conference Like a Negotiation

The conference is informal - usually one officer, one phone call, real settlement authority - and preparation mirrors theirs: know your strongest issues and your weakest, decide in advance what you would trade, and have every supporting document ready to produce on request, because 'I will send that today,' kept, is credibility banked. Two structural protections shape the room: Appeals will not raise new issues the examiner missed, and ex parte rules keep the officer's review independent of the exam function. The standing possibility of Tax Court keeps both sides' numbers honest, and most cases settle in one or two calls.

Close the Paper Carefully

Settlements end in computations and agreement forms - each checked line by line, because implementing math contains errors and certain forms close doors others leave open. And carry the right meta-expectation into the whole process: appeal almost always, because the downside is bounded at the number you already have, the upside is open, and the cost is the protest. The exceptions - cases where delay only accrues interest, or where the statute strategy points elsewhere - are exactly what the free first call screens for. If a 30-day letter or a denial with appeal rights is in your hands, the protest is buildable this week. Send it over.

Owe more than you can pay this month?

A payment plan is usually available. The question is which one, on what terms, and what it costs you over the life of the plan. One call sorts that out.